Upcoming workshop on Microbial Identification, Preservation & Genome Analysis at the MCC-NCCS, Pun

A workshop on ‘Microbial Identification, Preservation & Genome Analysis’ to be held on March 01 – 10, 2017 at the Microbial Culture Collection, National Centre for Cell Science, Sai Trinity Complex, Pashan- Sus Road, Pashan, Pune 411 021.
The content of workshop  includes lectures and hands on training on sample collection, isolation and identification of microbes, and long-term preservation of microorganisms. The course also include rRNA gene sequencing and phylogeny, proteotyping using MALDI-TOF MS, whole-cell fatty acid analysis using GC, and genome analysis. For more information one should visit the MCC-NCCS website (www.nccs.res.in/mcc).
The course of workshop is specifically designed, targeting Ph. D. students and early career faculty members from University, Colleges, Research Institutes and Industries. A registration fee is INR 12,000 (Rupees twelve thousand only) for academia and INR 20,000 (Rupees twenty thousand) for industry associated participants, which is inclusive of accommodation, lunch and tea. Applications form (application-form_mcc) for the workshop require name and contact information of applicant, and brief write-up on current research work  of applicant and potential benefit expected from this workshop in applicants research.
The last date for application is January 29, 2017.
Interested researchers can submit their application forms by email to mccpuneworkshop@gmail.com
Advertisements

Curious case of Mesorhizobium loti type strain

Bacterial identification requires a series of experiments to accurately designate the taxonomic affiliation of a strain. Sequencing of 16S rRNA gene has been considered as one of the most important feature of bacteria taxonomy. If two bacterial strains show less than 97% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, they are separate species. To find out the sequence similarity reference sequences are critically required. There are a number of databases (NCBI, EZtaxon, RDP etc…) offering well curated sequences of 16S rRNA gene of validly published type strains, and allow microbiologists to designate taxonomic affiliation to his/her strains accurately. Sequencing of 16S rRNA gene for strain confirmation and validation is a routine for us at the Microbial Culture Collection, we use EZTaxon database for bacterial identifications. Yesterday, I was in between of confirming few type strains of Mesorhizobium acquired form DSMZ, when I searched the sequence of Mesorhiozbium loti DSM 2626(T) it showed 99.77% sequence similarity with Mesorhizobium qingshengii CCBAU 33460(T) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. EZTaxon results of Mesorhizobium loti DSM 2626 (T).

Fig. 1. EZTaxon results of Mesorhizobium loti DSM 2626 (T).

I thought, ok it’s fine and may happens some time when the strains have very similar 16S rRNA gene sequences, but to my surprise the type strain of M. loti USDA 3471(T) was placed at 22 position with a similarity of 97.97%. This is something very unusual, I never faced such situations where 16S rRNA gene sequence of same strain showed such a huge difference. I went back to my sequence contig and confirm the quality of sequence once again, which was absolutely alright. After this, I compared the newly generated sequence with the sequence accession mentioned in the strain description webpage of DSMZ, it showed 99.9% similarity, which confirmed that the strain is original. Now, several questions poured in to my mind making me restless:
Is the strain deposited at DSMZ is not the original type strain?
Where DSMZ got this strain in to their collection?
What could the possible reason for low sequence similarity?
Today, I started my day with the objective to find out answer for all my questions. The first thing, I did was to search the sequence in NCBI blast using options of exclude models and uncultured/environmental samples sequences, and limit to sequences from type material. The blast results gave answer to all my questions within few seconds as there were four sequences of M. loti type strains as top hits (Fig.2).

Fig. 2. NCBI Blast search results after using options of exclud modeles and unclutured/environmental samples sequences, and limit to sequences from type material

Fig. 2. NCBI Blast search results after using options of exclud modeles and unclutured/environmental samples sequences, and limit to sequences from type material

It was quite hilarious to find such answer, which I never expected, there were multiple sequences of the same strain with huge variation among them. Now, a new question arise that how is it possible?
I found answer to this question in a article by Willems et al. (2001) http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0723202004700697, reporting the differences between subcultures of the Mesorhizobium loti type strains from different culture collections. After reading this article, I come to know that the strain with which I am dealing is the valide type strain of M. loti and the 16S rRNA gene sequence of M. loti USDA3471(T) curated by EZTaxon is not the valide type strain. This article not only cleared my confusion on the type strain of M. loti, but also attracted my attention towards the importance of quality control of reference material deposited at or exchanged between culture collection.

 

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress.com. After you read this, you should delete and write your own post, with a new title above. Or hit Add New on the left (of the admin dashboard) to start a fresh post.

Here are some suggestions for your first post.

  1. You can find new ideas for what to blog about by reading the Daily Post.
  2. Add PressThis to your browser. It creates a new blog post for you about any interesting  page you read on the web.
  3. Make some changes to this page, and then hit preview on the right. You can always preview any post or edit it before you share it to the world.